Giles08
01-19 11:27 AM
One of my friends has her concern:
Her mother visited her last year. Her mother went to hospital (Feb, 2007) for emergency and got debt for $4300. My friend was the contact person of her mother in US and signed a form (I am not sure what form) for the bill. So far my friend did not have money to pay for the debt. The hospital transfer the debt to a debt company. The debt company has put her mother's name in credit record.
My friend need go outside US for her first H1-b visa interview. She is concerning if she will have problem to get her h1-b visa because of the debt? Any chance to get check such as name check,....
Thank you in advance!
Her mother visited her last year. Her mother went to hospital (Feb, 2007) for emergency and got debt for $4300. My friend was the contact person of her mother in US and signed a form (I am not sure what form) for the bill. So far my friend did not have money to pay for the debt. The hospital transfer the debt to a debt company. The debt company has put her mother's name in credit record.
My friend need go outside US for her first H1-b visa interview. She is concerning if she will have problem to get her h1-b visa because of the debt? Any chance to get check such as name check,....
Thank you in advance!
wallpaper AVP COLORING PAGES myrtle
AnotherDog
08-31 03:49 PM
Yes in Montreal, Canada on Aug 26th, 2009. All is well. I got my h1b visa renewed for 3 years. They had to do electronic followup since my LIN is not found in PIMS. But I got my passport, visa next day at 3pm.
MailForHoneyOnly
10-01 01:56 PM
Hi,
I'm on H1 on 8th Year Extension,Got a nice offer from a company, which is not large company, but projects they have are very long term projects I applied for 485 long timeback, but did not applied for my spouse , who is on H4 , applied for H1 which will be validated from 1st Oct'06.Can I switch the company now and start using EAD and apply for my spouse when my PD becomes current , or wait with the current employer till I apply for 485.
Need SUggestion.
or
Can I ask new company to start new GC Process under Perm and apply for I-140 and once its get approved, Use My EB3 PD with the EB2 Perm Application.
Or
Can I use H1 Transfer and AC-21 option since my 8th year extension is till end of 2009.
Any Suggestions will be Very Helpful
I'm on H1 on 8th Year Extension,Got a nice offer from a company, which is not large company, but projects they have are very long term projects I applied for 485 long timeback, but did not applied for my spouse , who is on H4 , applied for H1 which will be validated from 1st Oct'06.Can I switch the company now and start using EAD and apply for my spouse when my PD becomes current , or wait with the current employer till I apply for 485.
Need SUggestion.
or
Can I ask new company to start new GC Process under Perm and apply for I-140 and once its get approved, Use My EB3 PD with the EB2 Perm Application.
Or
Can I use H1 Transfer and AC-21 option since my 8th year extension is till end of 2009.
Any Suggestions will be Very Helpful
2011 Disney Coloring Pages
jliechty
June 23rd, 2005, 03:47 PM
I checked out the latest in your gallery here, looks great! :)
more...
nkavjs
10-30 03:43 PM
Friends Hi :
I have one question. Once we receive EAD and all 9 yards notices and once you switch from H1 to EAD system with same employer, are you still bound to work with same employer for full 40 hours.. can you cut your hours to 20 hours (nooo second job too). I can just work 20 hours a week . Is that permissible to be on EAD and still get GC processed?
Pls. advise me
Thanks
I have one question. Once we receive EAD and all 9 yards notices and once you switch from H1 to EAD system with same employer, are you still bound to work with same employer for full 40 hours.. can you cut your hours to 20 hours (nooo second job too). I can just work 20 hours a week . Is that permissible to be on EAD and still get GC processed?
Pls. advise me
Thanks
das0
12-09 11:45 AM
folks, will appreciate if you please refer a attorney to me
more...
roseball
03-29 04:41 PM
I think you will have an option to apply for a H1 for the remainder of the six years without being counted in the quota...
2010 crystal all coloring page
imm_pro
06-19 03:57 PM
atlast..it was long due..
more...
Macaca
11-01 05:36 PM
Democrats Again Look to Change GOP Motions; After Defeats, Leaders Studying Ways to Neuter Republicans' Motions to Recommit (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_52/news/20763-1.html) By Jennifer Yachnin | ROLL CALL STAFF, October 31, 2007
Exasperated over Republicans' continued efforts - and occasional success - in thwarting the House floor schedule, Democratic leaders acknowledged Tuesday they are reviewing the chamber's rules to determine how to curb the minority's ability to put up roadblocks at critical moments in the legislative process.
House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D) said the committee's Democrats have begun meeting with both current and former Parliamentarians to discuss the chamber's rules and potential changes.
The New York lawmaker said those discussions have focused in part on the motion to recommit - one of the few procedural items in the minority party's toolbox that allows them to offer legislative alternatives when a bill hits the floor, and that Republicans have used to force difficult votes on Democrats or prompted legislation to be pulled from the floor - as well as other procedures, which she declined to detail.
Slaughter said no timeline exists for the review or potential alterations, however. "Nothing is imminent. We want to take our time and do it right," she said.
But one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said the majority is considering neutering the motion-to-recommit process and converting it to little more than a last-chance amendment for the minority party.
Under current House rules, the minority's motion can effectively shelve legislation through minor alterations to the language of their motion - specifically designating for a bill to be returned to its committee "promptly," rather than the usual "forthwith."
Republican leaders have used that strategy to force Democrats to either vote against measures they would otherwise support or vote to kill their own bill. Earlier this month, the GOP used that procedure to target a bill governing federal wiretapping and surveillance programs, prompting Democrats to scrub an expected vote.
Another Democratic lawmaker, who also is familiar with discussions and asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of those conversations, said that is only one option under consideration.
"We don't want to limit the minority's ability to have legitimate motions to recommit," the Democrat said.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) railed against Republicans' use of that particular tactic at his weekly press conference Tuesday, echoing complaints Democrats have raised off-and-on since March.
"The Republicans continue to use the motion to recommit for political purposes, not substantive purposes. Substantive purposes would be trying to change policy. For the most part, what they do with their motions to recommit are not change policy, but try to construct difficult political votes for Members," Hoyer said. "We understand that. To some degree, we did that as well. So it is not surprising."
While Hoyer acknowledged that Democrats had at times employed the same approach in the past, he criticized Republicans for using the method 22 times thus far in the 110th Congress, asserting that Democrats used the tactic only four times between 1995 and 1998.
"This is a game. It is a relatively cynical game," Hoyer added. "That doesn't mean it is not an effective game and causes questions. So we are trying to deal with that."
Democrats earlier had sought to alter the House rules on motions to recommit in May - an unusual step, given that the chamber's rules are rarely reopened mid-session - but Republicans rebelled on the House floor, and Democratic leaders agreed to forgo the changes, at least temporarily.
Democratic leaders suggested in August that they planned to offer legislation on the House floor aimed at dissuading Republicans from offering contentious procedural amendments tied to such hot-button issues as immigration. At the same time, Democrats hoped to provide insulation to their own Members with a separate vote on those topics, but have yet to produce any such resolutions.
Republicans have succeeded in winning 21 motions to recommit - the majority of which would not shelve the legislation they amend - in the past 10 months, a point that President Bush praised in a Tuesday meeting at the White House with Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), according to a GOP aide.
"Republicans and Democrats alike have lived under the very same germaneness rules since 1822, and changing them won't solve the majority's inherent inability to govern," Boehner spokesman Brian Kennedy said. "This isn't a question of rules, it's one of competence."
Exasperated over Republicans' continued efforts - and occasional success - in thwarting the House floor schedule, Democratic leaders acknowledged Tuesday they are reviewing the chamber's rules to determine how to curb the minority's ability to put up roadblocks at critical moments in the legislative process.
House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D) said the committee's Democrats have begun meeting with both current and former Parliamentarians to discuss the chamber's rules and potential changes.
The New York lawmaker said those discussions have focused in part on the motion to recommit - one of the few procedural items in the minority party's toolbox that allows them to offer legislative alternatives when a bill hits the floor, and that Republicans have used to force difficult votes on Democrats or prompted legislation to be pulled from the floor - as well as other procedures, which she declined to detail.
Slaughter said no timeline exists for the review or potential alterations, however. "Nothing is imminent. We want to take our time and do it right," she said.
But one Democratic lawmaker, who asked not to be identified, said the majority is considering neutering the motion-to-recommit process and converting it to little more than a last-chance amendment for the minority party.
Under current House rules, the minority's motion can effectively shelve legislation through minor alterations to the language of their motion - specifically designating for a bill to be returned to its committee "promptly," rather than the usual "forthwith."
Republican leaders have used that strategy to force Democrats to either vote against measures they would otherwise support or vote to kill their own bill. Earlier this month, the GOP used that procedure to target a bill governing federal wiretapping and surveillance programs, prompting Democrats to scrub an expected vote.
Another Democratic lawmaker, who also is familiar with discussions and asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of those conversations, said that is only one option under consideration.
"We don't want to limit the minority's ability to have legitimate motions to recommit," the Democrat said.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) railed against Republicans' use of that particular tactic at his weekly press conference Tuesday, echoing complaints Democrats have raised off-and-on since March.
"The Republicans continue to use the motion to recommit for political purposes, not substantive purposes. Substantive purposes would be trying to change policy. For the most part, what they do with their motions to recommit are not change policy, but try to construct difficult political votes for Members," Hoyer said. "We understand that. To some degree, we did that as well. So it is not surprising."
While Hoyer acknowledged that Democrats had at times employed the same approach in the past, he criticized Republicans for using the method 22 times thus far in the 110th Congress, asserting that Democrats used the tactic only four times between 1995 and 1998.
"This is a game. It is a relatively cynical game," Hoyer added. "That doesn't mean it is not an effective game and causes questions. So we are trying to deal with that."
Democrats earlier had sought to alter the House rules on motions to recommit in May - an unusual step, given that the chamber's rules are rarely reopened mid-session - but Republicans rebelled on the House floor, and Democratic leaders agreed to forgo the changes, at least temporarily.
Democratic leaders suggested in August that they planned to offer legislation on the House floor aimed at dissuading Republicans from offering contentious procedural amendments tied to such hot-button issues as immigration. At the same time, Democrats hoped to provide insulation to their own Members with a separate vote on those topics, but have yet to produce any such resolutions.
Republicans have succeeded in winning 21 motions to recommit - the majority of which would not shelve the legislation they amend - in the past 10 months, a point that President Bush praised in a Tuesday meeting at the White House with Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), according to a GOP aide.
"Republicans and Democrats alike have lived under the very same germaneness rules since 1822, and changing them won't solve the majority's inherent inability to govern," Boehner spokesman Brian Kennedy said. "This isn't a question of rules, it's one of competence."
hair the Beach Coloring Pages
whattodo21
04-14 11:32 AM
Can I use EAD to do part time work?
Can it be in any field?
Does any of this affect my gc process?
I-140 , I-485 filed
Spouse is the primary filer.
Can it be in any field?
Does any of this affect my gc process?
I-140 , I-485 filed
Spouse is the primary filer.
more...
jadoo
07-23 07:10 PM
I have a complicated case related to me and my fiance's immigration status involving I-485, F1 and H1.
Any recommendations for lawyers in Bay area who can help me out? Anyone who does phone consultation would work too.
thanks in advance.
Any recommendations for lawyers in Bay area who can help me out? Anyone who does phone consultation would work too.
thanks in advance.
hot Beach and sand castle coloring
snowshoe
12-19 03:46 PM
I have an approved labor and I-140 (EB2) with a PD of Aug 03, since USCIS guideline says that the demand for EB2 India seems to exceed the supply of GCs, I am not sure how much longer it will take for my PD to be current.
My company has a approved labor (EB2) with PD of 2002 (with job requirements matching my qualifications). I have the following questions:
1. Can I apply for premium processing for the I-140 stage with the substituted labor?
2. If not, does it take longer to process I-140 with substituted labor than the normal case?
3. if I can get the labor with 2002 PD, can my company give my labor to someone else (especially since my I-140 is already approved with that labor)
Thanks in advance.
My company has a approved labor (EB2) with PD of 2002 (with job requirements matching my qualifications). I have the following questions:
1. Can I apply for premium processing for the I-140 stage with the substituted labor?
2. If not, does it take longer to process I-140 with substituted labor than the normal case?
3. if I can get the labor with 2002 PD, can my company give my labor to someone else (especially since my I-140 is already approved with that labor)
Thanks in advance.
more...
house starfish coloring pages
Blog Feeds
09-11 12:00 PM
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released an updated H-1B cap count of 45,100 as of August 28, 2009. This reflects an increase of 100 cases from the prior count, provided on August 14, 2009. The advanced-degree cap remains at 20,000. The USCIS continues to accept FY2010 H1B cases under the advanced-degree and regular caps.
We suggest to US employers to file H-1B Petitions only if they can able to provide the Client details like Letter from the end-client, Work-orders confirming the placement. If you are having an in-house requirement, provide USCIS with ample proof of your in-house requirements. Considering the flood of H-1B RFEs, we have to be bit cautious in filing works. The standard approach prevailing until last year needs a re-look. Be assured, if you are right on papers and abide the Immigration requirement, you will for sure come with flying colors. We will be happy to help and support you in H-1B and other filings. It is widely believed that the H-1B Cap will be available even after Sept. 30, 2009.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/h1b_cap_update_1.html)
We suggest to US employers to file H-1B Petitions only if they can able to provide the Client details like Letter from the end-client, Work-orders confirming the placement. If you are having an in-house requirement, provide USCIS with ample proof of your in-house requirements. Considering the flood of H-1B RFEs, we have to be bit cautious in filing works. The standard approach prevailing until last year needs a re-look. Be assured, if you are right on papers and abide the Immigration requirement, you will for sure come with flying colors. We will be happy to help and support you in H-1B and other filings. It is widely believed that the H-1B Cap will be available even after Sept. 30, 2009.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/09/h1b_cap_update_1.html)
tattoo Beach coloring sheets
arnet
06-14 03:32 PM
contact the following people and ask what you need to do to file taxes:
1. contact employer
2. contact your payroll company (like adp, etc) that process your company's payroll
3. contact IRS helpline or customer service (including local or state tax dept)
4. contact experienced tax consultant (CPAs)
I thought employer should have arranged for duplicate one. if not contact above all people and find out what you can do about it.
1. contact employer
2. contact your payroll company (like adp, etc) that process your company's payroll
3. contact IRS helpline or customer service (including local or state tax dept)
4. contact experienced tax consultant (CPAs)
I thought employer should have arranged for duplicate one. if not contact above all people and find out what you can do about it.
more...
pictures Zorb Ball Coloring Page
gc2
09-29 07:20 AM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=13697
dresses Coloring Pages amp; Activities
ncmahesh
07-14 12:15 PM
it was actually recjected it was kept under 221 g in uk , he was returing to india. so he asked embassy to retrun all the papers. so they gave back
more...
makeup the Beach Coloring Pages
newbie2020
04-14 04:34 PM
I was checking the http://congress.org
I noticed they have a Calls to Action from Groups and Organization on the home page, When i tried to see if there are any Immigration related issues posted There were many like increasing H2A etc but nothing corresponding to Retrogression or GC waiting faced by thousands of immigrants.
There are 100s of bills waiting for Co-sponsors published on this website.
I felt we should do post about the issues faced by Thousands of Legal immigrants who are struck in retrogression or Per country limit.
This may be a good place to put as a number of representatives may view it and it is a good way for us to let the people know of the issues.
Any thoughts........
I noticed they have a Calls to Action from Groups and Organization on the home page, When i tried to see if there are any Immigration related issues posted There were many like increasing H2A etc but nothing corresponding to Retrogression or GC waiting faced by thousands of immigrants.
There are 100s of bills waiting for Co-sponsors published on this website.
I felt we should do post about the issues faced by Thousands of Legal immigrants who are struck in retrogression or Per country limit.
This may be a good place to put as a number of representatives may view it and it is a good way for us to let the people know of the issues.
Any thoughts........
girlfriend printable big each ball
brahmam
06-13 06:58 PM
Now that all are current, and we know the many benefits of an EAD ( primary being spousal employment) what exactly are the no-nos to apply for 485?
1. Even if you want to change jobs after 6 months, you gotta stick to the same position in the new company?
2. Any restrictions on travel?
3. Yearly EAD renewal can be a headache?
Any more?
P.S: Guys, I am as elated as any of you but just wanted some perspective before pushing my employer.
1. Even if you want to change jobs after 6 months, you gotta stick to the same position in the new company?
2. Any restrictions on travel?
3. Yearly EAD renewal can be a headache?
Any more?
P.S: Guys, I am as elated as any of you but just wanted some perspective before pushing my employer.
hairstyles notre dame colouring
jkanakaraj
08-29 05:06 PM
http://www.kanakaraj.com/kanakaraj_stamp.gif
psk79
07-19 09:14 PM
Hi, I have been noticing on .com that even after the mess-ups in Aug 08 when similar visa bulletin came out and uscis approved lots of cases from 06 ignoring people from 04 and 05, they are not approving cases in pd order even now (well not like before but still bad). I mean how can they approve sep 05 cases before all 03/2005 cases are approved especially if they are all pre-adj and ready (atleast most are). Even though technically anyone until oct 1, 2005 is eligible for visa number, Shouldn't they go in order? This is very unfair given you don't know when they might run out of numbers and TSC is snail paced doing 3-6 approvals a day atmost while NSC is doing tons a day :) Any comments?
newuser
01-14 10:23 PM
Voted.
Search for "Green Card" as the keyword also
Search for "Green Card" as the keyword also
No comments:
Post a Comment