textus
01-19 12:52 PM
Hi Guys:
I'm in a process of transfering my H1B to a new employer. I've already hired a lawyer and paid him his fee. The lawyer spoke to my employer and everything was going fine. Now, my new employer tells me that his company "froze hiring" untill further notice !?!
I'm wondering
1. Is my employer lying and why?
2. Can I somehow make my employer pay me back the money I already paid to the lawyer?
I'm in a process of transfering my H1B to a new employer. I've already hired a lawyer and paid him his fee. The lawyer spoke to my employer and everything was going fine. Now, my new employer tells me that his company "froze hiring" untill further notice !?!
I'm wondering
1. Is my employer lying and why?
2. Can I somehow make my employer pay me back the money I already paid to the lawyer?
wallpaper selena gomez hairstyles short
jettu77
01-02 10:01 AM
On my spouse's AP I also had the document mailed message.
chrs
03-27 01:16 AM
This are my drawings for the contest, I hope you like...
http://img136.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=myself1.jpg
http://img136.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=myself1.jpg
2011 selena gomez haircut styles.
swamy
12-10 09:00 PM
yes you do - they process it pretty quickly. check out www.britainusa.com
more...
ramus
01-27 09:42 AM
Please join our NC IV group and you will get all info from our NC members.
please reply!!!!
please reply!!!!
Anders �stberg
February 6th, 2005, 02:06 AM
A classic type of picture... this fruit is not very "photogenic" though, looks sticky and bruised... does not make me want to go buy some if you know what I mean. :)
more...
Macaca
02-20 10:10 AM
Some paras from Information, Please (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/18/AR2007021801064.html): Watchdog Groups, Some Lawmakers Say Congressional Reports Should Be Made Public.
Elizabeth Williamson (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/elizabeth+williamson/), Washington Post Staff Writer.
Deep inside the Library of Congress, 500 researchers pound out the secret intelligence Congress uses to make law.
Legislators request 6,000 Congressional Research Service reports a year, on weapons systems and farm subsidies, prescription prices and energy use. Together, they offer what lobbyists and industry want most: clues to what's next on the Hill.
For years, open-government groups have fought to make the reports public, and for years, many lawmakers have kept them under wraps. Or so they thought.
By insisting on secrecy, Congress instead created a bootleg market for the research. Every day, a small Texas company compiles the reports and sells them to lobbyists, lawyers and others who pay thousands of dollars for a peek at the reports and what they say about the congressional agenda. And it's all legal.
"How I get them is my trade secret . . . but I get them all," said Walt Seager, who digs up the reports for Gallery Watch, a legislative tracking service.
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) was established in 1914 as Congress's supplier of nonpartisan research and analysis. Its reports are neither classified nor copyrighted, but they've long been the exclusive property of lawmakers, who distribute them as they see fit. Taxpayers supply the agency's $100 million annual budget, inspiring open-government groups and some lawmakers, including Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) to push for public release of CRS reports.
Aftergood and others have fought back by posting every CRS report they can find on their Web sites. But watchdog groups have released only about 10 percent of the total, not enough to reveal the patterns that suggest what Congress might do next.
Subscribers to Gallery Watch pay about $4,000 a year to get all the CRS reports, online and searchable, delivered weekly.
At a recent meeting for potential customers, Riendeau explained that clients scan the reports for intelligence "kind of how the CIA operates," by spotting the political trends suggested by their contents and timing, he said. About a year ago, lawmakers made a flurry of requests for CRS reports related to North Korean counterfeiting of U.S. currency; not until months later, when the Treasury Department cracked down on North Korea, did the issue appear in newspapers.
Resources
CRS REPORTS (http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/crs.shtm)
A peek at "Congress' Brain" (http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/19/182559/089)
You'd Know if You Were Congressional (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/21/AR2007032102043.html)
Elizabeth Williamson (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/elizabeth+williamson/), Washington Post Staff Writer.
Deep inside the Library of Congress, 500 researchers pound out the secret intelligence Congress uses to make law.
Legislators request 6,000 Congressional Research Service reports a year, on weapons systems and farm subsidies, prescription prices and energy use. Together, they offer what lobbyists and industry want most: clues to what's next on the Hill.
For years, open-government groups have fought to make the reports public, and for years, many lawmakers have kept them under wraps. Or so they thought.
By insisting on secrecy, Congress instead created a bootleg market for the research. Every day, a small Texas company compiles the reports and sells them to lobbyists, lawyers and others who pay thousands of dollars for a peek at the reports and what they say about the congressional agenda. And it's all legal.
"How I get them is my trade secret . . . but I get them all," said Walt Seager, who digs up the reports for Gallery Watch, a legislative tracking service.
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) was established in 1914 as Congress's supplier of nonpartisan research and analysis. Its reports are neither classified nor copyrighted, but they've long been the exclusive property of lawmakers, who distribute them as they see fit. Taxpayers supply the agency's $100 million annual budget, inspiring open-government groups and some lawmakers, including Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) to push for public release of CRS reports.
Aftergood and others have fought back by posting every CRS report they can find on their Web sites. But watchdog groups have released only about 10 percent of the total, not enough to reveal the patterns that suggest what Congress might do next.
Subscribers to Gallery Watch pay about $4,000 a year to get all the CRS reports, online and searchable, delivered weekly.
At a recent meeting for potential customers, Riendeau explained that clients scan the reports for intelligence "kind of how the CIA operates," by spotting the political trends suggested by their contents and timing, he said. About a year ago, lawmakers made a flurry of requests for CRS reports related to North Korean counterfeiting of U.S. currency; not until months later, when the Treasury Department cracked down on North Korea, did the issue appear in newspapers.
Resources
CRS REPORTS (http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/news/crs.shtm)
A peek at "Congress' Brain" (http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2/19/182559/089)
You'd Know if You Were Congressional (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/21/AR2007032102043.html)
2010 selena gomez haircut short.
upuaut
08-29 02:06 AM
I love the G4, but I know it does have some problems with 3D rendering in some situations. I'm not sure why that would be happening.
personaly I use 600+ megs and I still find myself lacking in the memory department.
Sorry.. I don't really know why that would be happening.
personaly I use 600+ megs and I still find myself lacking in the memory department.
Sorry.. I don't really know why that would be happening.
more...
needhelp!
09-17 06:56 PM
Texas State Chapter will be reserving a booth space at the DFW Diwali Mela.
Last year we raised $580 for our cause and hope to do better.
Event Details:
Date: Sunday October 4th, 3 pm onwards
Venue: New Cowboys Stadium in Arlington TX.
New Cowboys Stadium - Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=New+Cowboys+Stadium&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=40.732051,93.076172&ie=UTF8&z=15&iwloc=A)
Entry Ticket to the Event: $8
Parking: Free
Please attend and drop by to encourage us. Please contact me if you would like to volunteer.
Last year we raised $580 for our cause and hope to do better.
Event Details:
Date: Sunday October 4th, 3 pm onwards
Venue: New Cowboys Stadium in Arlington TX.
New Cowboys Stadium - Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=New+Cowboys+Stadium&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=40.732051,93.076172&ie=UTF8&z=15&iwloc=A)
Entry Ticket to the Event: $8
Parking: Free
Please attend and drop by to encourage us. Please contact me if you would like to volunteer.
hair Selena Gomez Short Hair Style
minimalist
08-11 02:35 PM
She should be able to go and get stamped now. But she will have to wait until about 10 days before october 1st to enter US using that stamp.
Hope this helps.
Hope this helps.
more...
mohitb272
12-06 04:34 PM
Visitor's visa for my parents expired recently (it was a 5 yr VISA & they visited here 3 times and returned within 6 months each time) and they want to re-apply for a visa. My question is - Do I still need to send in the Document of Support, Employer and Bank letter or they can re-apply without these documents? On the safer side, I am sending the documents but in my view there should not be a need for the support documents...Anyone in similar boat?
hot selena gomez hair updos.
pappu
11-09 02:07 PM
i am closing this thread. It has been mentioned before several times, pls create new thread with description in the title.
more...
house selena gomez short hairstyles.
Macaca
05-15 10:07 AM
Congress's Start (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/12/AR2007051201099.html) -- It's time to begin recording concrete achievements, Sunday, May 13, 2007
FOUR MONTHS into the 110th Congress is too early to assign grades to the new Democratic majority -- but not too soon to remind lawmakers that most of their self-assigned tasks remain undone; that progress in the next few months on immigration, trade and lobbying reform is critical; and that this Congress will be judged on what it accomplished -- and on where it punted.
The biggest punt thus far concerns entitlement spending, an issue on which the administration, chiefly Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., has been seeking to jump-start discussions. This is an auspicious moment that Democrats seem determined to squander. First, the Democratic Congress has a lame-duck Republican president who could take, or at least share, the blame for cuts that will have to be part of any solution. Second, as members of Congress well know, the longer they wait to take on Medicare and, particularly, Social Security, the harder the problem they will face.
Democrats have seized on Vice President Cheney's comments to Fox News in January about raising payroll taxes -- "This president has been very, very clear on his position on taxes, and nothing's changed" -- as a rationale for why they can't risk bargaining with the administration. But this is an excuse, not a legitimate basis for inaction. After all, Mr. Cheney also said there would be "no preconditions."
Meanwhile, lawmakers for the most part have used their oversight powers usefully, though we wish more energy were spent examining torture policies, for instance, and less on subpoenaing the secretary of state. Although the budget process has yet to play itself out, the adoption of tough pay-as-you-go rules to constrain new mandatory spending has had a surprisingly beneficial effect in restraining demands for new programs. The Senate's passage of a measure to strengthen the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory powers is an important step.
Still unanswered is whether Democrats will deliver on their campaign promises and whether both sides will find ways to forge consensus on issues of common concern. House Democrats' "Six for '06" campaign pledge has so far amounted to "None in '07." Much of this (federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, for instance) is out of Democrats' control, given the Senate's supermajority rules and President Bush's veto pen; in some cases (having Medicare negotiate drug prices, for example), that's just as well. But even such relatively noncontroversial matters as increasing the minimum wage remain undone. Voters are starting to notice, and the coming weeks will be crucial for Democrats to put some actual accomplishments on the board.
On a matter that is within their control, it's still uncertain whether House Democrats will produce a lobbying and ethics reform package worthy of their campaign pledges to end the "culture of corruption." The key tests will be whether lawmakers require lobbyists to disclose the bundles of campaign cash they deliver (as the Senate version of the measure has done) and whether the House will create a more credible ethics process, including some kind of independent arm to assess and investigate ethics allegations.
On immigration, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is right to bring to the floor last year's measure, which won the support of 23 Republicans. The clock is ticking on this incendiary topic, and the administration has not improved matters by pushing an unbalanced and punitive plan. If Mr. Bush is looking for a legacy issue beyond Iraq, this could be it, but he is, so far, blowing the chance.
On trade, an agreement that seems to clear the way for approval of trade pacts with Peru and Panama is a start, but only that. Much more important is the passage of deals with Colombia and South Korea, and extension of presidential trade negotiating authority, which is needed to complete a new global trade treaty. Congressional leaders should work with Mr. Bush to extend the authority -- not because they like or trust him but because doing so will be better for the economy in which they, too, have an important stake.
FOUR MONTHS into the 110th Congress is too early to assign grades to the new Democratic majority -- but not too soon to remind lawmakers that most of their self-assigned tasks remain undone; that progress in the next few months on immigration, trade and lobbying reform is critical; and that this Congress will be judged on what it accomplished -- and on where it punted.
The biggest punt thus far concerns entitlement spending, an issue on which the administration, chiefly Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., has been seeking to jump-start discussions. This is an auspicious moment that Democrats seem determined to squander. First, the Democratic Congress has a lame-duck Republican president who could take, or at least share, the blame for cuts that will have to be part of any solution. Second, as members of Congress well know, the longer they wait to take on Medicare and, particularly, Social Security, the harder the problem they will face.
Democrats have seized on Vice President Cheney's comments to Fox News in January about raising payroll taxes -- "This president has been very, very clear on his position on taxes, and nothing's changed" -- as a rationale for why they can't risk bargaining with the administration. But this is an excuse, not a legitimate basis for inaction. After all, Mr. Cheney also said there would be "no preconditions."
Meanwhile, lawmakers for the most part have used their oversight powers usefully, though we wish more energy were spent examining torture policies, for instance, and less on subpoenaing the secretary of state. Although the budget process has yet to play itself out, the adoption of tough pay-as-you-go rules to constrain new mandatory spending has had a surprisingly beneficial effect in restraining demands for new programs. The Senate's passage of a measure to strengthen the Food and Drug Administration's regulatory powers is an important step.
Still unanswered is whether Democrats will deliver on their campaign promises and whether both sides will find ways to forge consensus on issues of common concern. House Democrats' "Six for '06" campaign pledge has so far amounted to "None in '07." Much of this (federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, for instance) is out of Democrats' control, given the Senate's supermajority rules and President Bush's veto pen; in some cases (having Medicare negotiate drug prices, for example), that's just as well. But even such relatively noncontroversial matters as increasing the minimum wage remain undone. Voters are starting to notice, and the coming weeks will be crucial for Democrats to put some actual accomplishments on the board.
On a matter that is within their control, it's still uncertain whether House Democrats will produce a lobbying and ethics reform package worthy of their campaign pledges to end the "culture of corruption." The key tests will be whether lawmakers require lobbyists to disclose the bundles of campaign cash they deliver (as the Senate version of the measure has done) and whether the House will create a more credible ethics process, including some kind of independent arm to assess and investigate ethics allegations.
On immigration, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is right to bring to the floor last year's measure, which won the support of 23 Republicans. The clock is ticking on this incendiary topic, and the administration has not improved matters by pushing an unbalanced and punitive plan. If Mr. Bush is looking for a legacy issue beyond Iraq, this could be it, but he is, so far, blowing the chance.
On trade, an agreement that seems to clear the way for approval of trade pacts with Peru and Panama is a start, but only that. Much more important is the passage of deals with Colombia and South Korea, and extension of presidential trade negotiating authority, which is needed to complete a new global trade treaty. Congressional leaders should work with Mr. Bush to extend the authority -- not because they like or trust him but because doing so will be better for the economy in which they, too, have an important stake.
tattoo selena gomez hairstyles short
kaisersose
09-14 02:35 PM
TX is now processing upto July 19. provides a better update as we knew this already.
more...
pictures 2009 cool short hairstyle from
hemasar
05-02 01:06 PM
Check this out
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2061
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2061
dresses selena gomez short haircut
pappu
03-28 03:36 PM
Immigration Voice (IVpappu) on Twitter (http://twitter.com/IVpappu)
more...
makeup selena gomez hairstyles short
vinabath
04-06 12:06 AM
Iinteresting article:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008366#PaperDownload
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008366#PaperDownload
girlfriend selena gomez hairstyles short.
Blog Feeds
08-03 12:50 PM
Harsh words from the senior columnist for Time Magazine:Lou Dobbs continues to make a fool of himself, of CNN and of Time Warner, which owns this blog and pays my salary. When Jim DeMint, the oh-so-conservative Senator from South Carolina, says that the Obama birth certificate isn't an issue, and when electronic copies of the birth certificate have been produced--and certified--by the state of Hawaii, one wonders why Dobbs keeps flogging this...and why CNN allows him to do it. Certainly, Dobbs has a right to say what he likes. Plenty of nutballs go on television--as guests--and say all sorts of...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/joe-klein-dobbs-a-public-embarrassment.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/joe-klein-dobbs-a-public-embarrassment.html)
hairstyles house selena gomez hairstyles selena gomez up hairstyles. selena gomez short
madhu_rao73
08-19 12:40 PM
Hi, i have applied my labor application eb3 in 2003 august and got approveed, applied 140 and 485 in july 2007 and i am on EAD
i came to USA on Company A in august 2000 and moved to Company B on 2003 march and applied for green card in EB3
now my company A is willing to apply my gc in EB2 and capture EB3 pd
but my lawyer says if my EB2 gets rejected they may not issue my GC saying that my new job is not same or similar (he says eb3 job which does not require Master is not same as EB2 which requires Master or 5+ years exp)
Company A and Company B are belongs to same management so the compnay is ready to do my EB2, but my lawyer is telling there is lot of risk involved
Please Advice
Thanks
i came to USA on Company A in august 2000 and moved to Company B on 2003 march and applied for green card in EB3
now my company A is willing to apply my gc in EB2 and capture EB3 pd
but my lawyer says if my EB2 gets rejected they may not issue my GC saying that my new job is not same or similar (he says eb3 job which does not require Master is not same as EB2 which requires Master or 5+ years exp)
Company A and Company B are belongs to same management so the compnay is ready to do my EB2, but my lawyer is telling there is lot of risk involved
Please Advice
Thanks
Bogdan
07-03 07:52 PM
Hi,
Based on what I know, the medical exam has to be less than 1 year old on the date of I-485 application submission. However, I have seen different opinions on this forum. Some state that the exam date cannot be more than 30 days before I-485 submission, because the HIV test and syphyllis test (sorry if not typed correctly) are valid for 30 days only. Could anyone clarify this, please?
Thanks in advance.
Bogdan
Based on what I know, the medical exam has to be less than 1 year old on the date of I-485 application submission. However, I have seen different opinions on this forum. Some state that the exam date cannot be more than 30 days before I-485 submission, because the HIV test and syphyllis test (sorry if not typed correctly) are valid for 30 days only. Could anyone clarify this, please?
Thanks in advance.
Bogdan
va_dude
07-09 02:04 PM
One of the docs folks usually send is an employment letter from your new employer detailing the job duties, etc.
Most would give you this only after you join the new employer.
I don't think an offer letter with job duties would suffice.
Just my 2 cents. Hope this helps.
Most would give you this only after you join the new employer.
I don't think an offer letter with job duties would suffice.
Just my 2 cents. Hope this helps.
No comments:
Post a Comment